Risk management and prevention methodologies: a comparison

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18046/syt.v14i36.2214

Keywords:

Analysis, management, methodologies, prevention, risks.

Abstract

In this paper we analyze nine risk management and prevention methodologies, carrying out a comparison of the stages that they include and determining if they take into account the human factor in the risk analysis and treatment. We observe that only 42.85% of the studied management risk methodologies include this factor and conclude that the NIST [National Institute of Standards and Technology] Risk Management methodology is the most complete, although it would be desirable for it to focus more on the human factor like the IDB [Inter-American Development Bank] Corruption Diagnosis, Prevention and Control in Programs of Civic Security methodology. 

Author Biographies

  • Nancy Acevedo, University of Pamplona

    Commercial and Systems Manager; Specialist in Project Management; and candidate to Magister in Informatics Project Management from Universidad de Pamplona (Colombia). Professor, OPS in the administrative area at the Basic Sciences Faculty, and member of LOGOS research group hotbed at the Universidad de Pamplona.

  • Cristina Satizábal, University of Pamplona

    Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering from Universidad del Cauca (Colombia) and Ph.D in Telematics Engineering from Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña (España). Professor at the Telecommunications Engineering Program (Universidad de Pamplona) and member of the LOGOS research group.

Downloads

Published

2016-03-30

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 36 (2016)

Section

Discussion papers

License

This journal is licensed under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode).