Beyond Clientelism and Technique: The Political Distribution of Government Budget in Colombia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i35.4745Keywords:
State Budget, Congress, Presidentialism, Distributive Politics, ColombiaAbstract
We examine the distribution of budget by the national executive power in a presidential system from the standpoint of the literature on tactical distribution. Our objective is to empirically test theories on the political rationale of this phenomenon. We begin with a comparative literature review, emphasizing voter and congress-oriented distribution. We derive three hypotheses that capture three distinct models: programmatic, voter-oriented, and legislative-oriented distribution. Then, we analyze an original dataset of budget distribution through cupos indicativos in Colombia during president Juan Manuel Santos’ first term (2010-2014). Using regression analyses, we show that increases in legislative representation have a positive association with the amount of resources distributed, which lend empirical support to theories of nonprogrammatic legislative-oriented distributive politics.
Downloads
References
Ames, Barry (1995). Strategy under Open-List Proportional Representation. American Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 406–433. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111619
Aprobada la reforma a las regalías (9 de junio de 2011). El Espectador. Recuperado de https://www.elespectador.com/politica/aprobada-la-reforma-a-las-regalias-article-276334/
Basset, Yann (2015). ¿Whipped Vote?: Personalization of Voting Behavior and Electoral Paths of Colombian Senators. Revista de Ciencia Política, 35(3), 489–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2015000300002
Benson, Allison L. (2021). From targeted private benefits to public goods: Land, distributive politics and changing political conditions in Colombia. World Development, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105571
Blaydes, Lisa (2020). Distributive Politics in the Middle East. En Routledge Handbook of Middle East Politics (pp. 471-479), editado por Larbi Sadiki. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bonilla-Mejía, Leonardo; Higuera-Mendieta, Iván Gonzalo (2017). Political alignment in the time of weak parties: electoral advantages and subnational transfers in Colombia. Documentos de Trabajo sobre Economía Regional y Urbana, 260.
Cadot, Oliver; Roller, Lars-Hendrick; Stephan, Andreas (2005). Contribution to productivity or pork barrel? The two faces of infrastructure investment. Journal of Public Economics, 90(6-7), 1133–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.006
Calvo, Ernesto; Murillo, María Victoria (2004). Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 742–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00099.x
Catalinac, Amy; Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce; Smith, Alastair (2020). A Tournament Theory of Pork Barrel Politics: The Case of Japan. Comparative Political Studies, 53(10–11), 1619–1655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019897677
Corte Suprema de Justicia abre indagación preliminar a todo el Congreso (13 de febrero de 2018). El Espectador. Recuperado de https://www.elespectador.com/noticias/judicial/corte–suprema–de–justicia–abre–indagacion–preliminar–a–todo–el–congreso/
Cox, Gary (2010). Swing voters, core voter and distributive politics. En Political Representation (pp. 342–357), editado por Ian Shapiro; Susan C. Stokes; Elisabeth J. Wood; Alexander S. Kirshner. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813146.015
Cox, Gary; McCubbins, Matthew (1986). Electoral politics as a redistributive game. Journal of Politics, 48(2), 370–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131098
Crisp, Brian; Ingall, Rachel (2002). Institutional Engineering and the Nature of Representation: Mapping the Effects of Electoral Reform in Colombia. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 733–748. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088430
Díaz-Cayeros, Alberto; Estévez, Federico; Magaloni, Beatriz (2016). The Political Logic of Poverty Relief: Electoral Strategies and Social Policy in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316492710
En 14 años se entregaron $57 billones a parlamentarios por cupos indicativos: Contraloría (7 de junio de 2018). El Espectador. Recuperado de https://www.elespectador.com/judicial/en-14-anos-se-entregaron-57-billones-a-parlamentarios-por-cupos-indicativos-contraloria-article-793153/
Fried, Brian (2012). Distributive Politics and Conditional Cash Transfers: The Case of Brazil’s Bolsa Familia. World Economics, 40(5), 1042–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.022
Garay, Candelaria; Palmer-Rubin, Brian; Poertner, Mathias (2020). Organizational and Partisan Brokerage of Social Benefits: Social Policy Linkages in Mexico. World Development, 136, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105103
Gibson, Edward (2012). Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Federal Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017992
Gibson, Edward; Calvo, Ernesto (2001). Federalism and Low Maintenance Constituencies: Territorial Dimensions of Economic Reform in Argentina. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02699765
Gibson, Edward; Calvo, Ernesto; Falleti, Tulia (2004). Reallocative Federalism: Territorial Overrepresentation and Public Spending in the Western Hemisphere. En Federalism and Democracy in Latin America (pp. 173–196), editado por Edward Gibson. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Golden, Miriam; Min, Brian (2013). Distributive Politics around the World. Annual Review of Political Science, 16, 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052209-121553
González, Lucas (2012). The redistributive effects of centralization and decentralization across subnational units. Latin American Research Review, 47(3), 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2012.0046
González, Lucas; Mamone, Ignacio (2012). La economía política de la distribución federal de obra pública en Argentina. Desarrollo Económico, 51(201), 59–80.
González, Lucas; Mamone, Ignacio (2015). Who Distributes? Presidents, Congress, Governors, and the Politics of Distribution in Argentina and Brazil. Revista Ibero–americana de Estudos Legislativos, 4, 17–32. https://doi.org/10.12660/riel.v4.n1.2015.49203
González-Tule, Luis; Guzmán-Mendoza, Carlos Enrique; Tuirán-Sarmiento, Ángel (2021). Clientelismo personalizado en Colombia: una aproximación histórico-institucional a un estudio de caso. Revista Sociedade e Cultura, 24. https://doi.org/10.5216/sec.v24.57225
Gordin, Jorge P. (2009). The Politics of Fiscal Decentralization Revisited: A Typology and Comparative Evidence. Fédéralisme Régionalisme, 9(2), 1-13.
Hicken, Allen (2011). Clientelism. Annual Review of Political Science, 14, 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220508
Hicken, Allen; Nathan, Noah L. (2020). Clientelism’s Red Herrings: Dead Ends and New Directions in the Study of Nonprogrammatic Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 23, 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032657
Hora 20 (14 de febrero de 2018). Caracol Radio [programa de radio]. Recuperado de https://alacarta.caracol.com.co/audio/097RD210000000641717/
Horiuchi, Yusaku; Lee, Seungjoo (2008). The Presidency, Regionalism, and Distributive Politics in South Korea. Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 861–8-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006298900
Jiang, Junyan; Zhang, Muyang (2020). Friends with benefits: Patronage networks and distributive politics in China. Journal of Public Economics, 184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104143
La mermelada parlamentaria de puestos y contratos (2014). Las 2 Orillas. Recuperado de https://www.las2orillas.co/la-mermelada-parlamentaria-de-puestos-contratos/
Larcinese, Valentino; Snyder, James M.; Testa, Cecilia (2013). Testing Models of Distributive Politics using Exit Polls to Measure Voters’ Preferences and Partisanship. British Journal of Political Science, 43(4), 845–875. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000245
Lee, Frances (2000). Senate Representation and Coalition Building in Distributive Politics. American Political Science Review, 94(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586380
Leyva-Botero, Santiago (2012). Las relaciones intergubernamentales en Colombia (2002–2010): Un análisis de los Consejos Comunales de gobierno. Análisis Político, 25(76), 125–144.
MacKinnon, James G.; White, Halberd (1985). Some heteroskedasticity consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 29(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90158-7
Mebane, Walter; Wawro, Geoffrey (2002). Presidential Pork Barrel Politics. Inédito.
Mejía-Guinand, Luis Bernardo; Botero, Felipe; Rodríguez-Raga, Juan Carlos (2008). ¿Pavimentando con votos? Apropiación presupuestal para proyectos de infraestructura vial en Colombia, 2002–2006. Colombia Internacional, 69, 14–42. https://doi.org/10.7440/colombiaint68.2008.01
Milanese, Juan Pablo; Manfredi, Luciana (2018). Nationalization of the Legislative Vote, Visibility and Reputation in the Written Press: An Analysis of Candidates’ Strategies for the 2014 Colombian Senate Election. Journal of Iberian and Latin American Research, 24(3), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/13260219.2019.1623289
Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria; Perotti, Roberto; Rostagno, Massimo (2000). Electoral Systems and Public Spending. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 609–657. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302753650346
Nazareno, Marcelo; Stokes, Susan C.; Brusco, Valeria (2006). Réditos y peligros electorales del gasto público en la Argentina. Desarrollo Económico, 46(181), 63–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/4151101
Olson, Mancur (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pachón-Buitrago, Mónica; Carroll, Royce (2016). The Unrealized Potential of Presidential Coalitions in Colombia. En Legislative Institutions and Lawmaking in Latin America (pp. 122–147), editado por Eduardo Alemán; George Tsebelis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198777861.001.0001
Porto, Alberto; Sanguinetti, Pablo (1996). Las transferencias intergubernamentales y la equidad distributiva: el caso argentino. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el CaribeCepal.
Porto, Alberto; Sanguinetti, Pablo (2001). Political determinants of intergovernmental grants: Evidence from Argentina. Economics & Politics, 13(3), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00092
Raile, Eric D.; Pereira, Carlos; Power, Timothy J. (2011). The Executive Toolbox: Building Legislative Support in a Multiparty Presidential Regime. Political Research Quarterly, 64(2), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912909355711
Rodríguez-Valero, Luis Alfredo; Maldonado-Gómez, Néstor (2020). Las políticas distributivas en Colombia: de los auxilios parlamentarios a las partidas de inversión social regional o ‘mermelada tóxica’. Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas, 50(132), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18566/rfdcp.v50n132.a01
Rogoff, Kenneth (1991). Equilibrium Political Budget Cycles. The American Economic Review, 80(1), 21–36.
Simison, Emilia (2014). Estrategias distributivas presidenciales en contextos cambiantes de centralización fiscal y nacionalización partidaria: Transferencias discrecionales en Argentina durante presidencias peronistas. Revista de Ciencia Política, 34(3), 561–582. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-090X2014000300003
Stokes, Susan C. (2005). Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051683
Stokes, Susan; Dunning, Thad; Nazareno, Marcelo; Brusco, Valeria (2013). Brokers, Voters and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107324909
Valencia, León; Ávila, Ariel (2014). Herederos del mal. Clanes, mafias y mermelada. Congreso 2014-2018. Bogotá: Ediciones B.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 José Antonio Fortou
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© Reserved Copyright
Material in this publication may be reproduced without authorization, provided the title, author and institutional source is acknowledged.
How to Cite
