Mudanças contemporâneas no mundo do trabalho, condições de subjetivação e governabilidade
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18046/recs.i25.2700Palavras-chave:
Trabalho, Governabilidade, SubjetividadeResumo
O objetivo deste artigo é realizar uma primeira aproximação às formas como parte da literatura – pertencente às ciências sociais – aborda, a nível conceitual e metodológico, algumas condições de subjetivação relacionadas com as mudanças contemporâneas no mundo do trabalho de uma perspectiva da analítica da governabilidade e interessando-se pelos efeitos na subjetividade que isso leva. Para a pesquisa dos artigos foi feito o uso de um recompilador de bases de dados Scopus e como técnica de pesquisa foi feito o uso de análise de conteúdo. Se encontra que há tendência a considerar que as subjetividades são formadas/produzidas por formas de governabilidade, o qual abre caminho em torno a uma discussão sobre subjetividades determinada ou subjetividades emergentes, como a consideração de formas de governabilidade promovem ou oferecem condições se subjetivação a partir das quais emergirão certas subjetividades.
Downloads
Referências
Agudo Sanchíz, A. (2009). Conocimiento, lenguaje, poder e intermediación. Perspectivas contemporáneas en la antropología de las políticas públicas. Estudios Sociológicos, (79), 63-110.
Alves, M. y Barreto, S. (2009). Reforma educacional, intensificação e autointensificação do trabalho docente. Educação y Sociedade, 30(106), 63-85. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302009000100004
Amigot, P. y Martínez, L. (2013). Gubernamentalidad neoliberal, subjetividad y transformación de la universidad. La evaluación del profesorado como técnica de normalización. Athenea Digital, 13(1), 99-120. Recuperado de: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4165304yinfo=resumenyidioma=SPA
Assusa, G. y Brandán Zehnder, M. G. (2014). “Salvar a la generación perdida”: gubernamentalidad, empleabilidad y cultura del trabajo. El caso de un programa de empleo para jóvenes en Argentina. Revista de Sociologia e Politica, 22(49), 157-174. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782014000100009
Bailey, P. L. J. (2015). Consultants of Conduct: New Actors, New Knowledges and New “Resilient” Subjectivities in the Governing of the Teacher. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(3), 232-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2015.1038696
Ball, S. (2016). Subjectivity as a Site of Struggle: Refusing Neoliberalism? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(8), 1.129-1.146. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1044072
Ball, S. y Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the Self, Resistance and Subjectivity Under Neoliberal Governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.740678
Bardin, L. (2002). Análisis de contenido. Madrid: Akal.
Bengtsson, A. (2011). European Policy of Career Guidance: The Interrelationship between Career Self-management and Production of Human Capital in the Knowledge Economy. Policy Futures in Education, 9(5), 616-627. https://doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.5.616
Bill, A. (2017). Counter-conduct in Creative University Research: Deliberations on Freedom. Higher Education Research y Development, 36(2), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1208158
Bocchetti, A. y Oliveira, B. (2012). Um professor (sempre) a formar: O governo das subjetividades docentes em programas especiais de formação. Curriculo Sem Fronteiras, 12(2), 376-392.
Boland, T. (2016). Seeking a Role: Disciplining Jobseekers as Actors in the Labour Market. Work, Employment y Society , 30(2), 334-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017015594097
Castel, R. (1997). Las metamorfosis de la cuestión social. Una crónica del salariado. Barcelona: Paidós.
Castel, R. (2004). La inseguridad social. ¿Qué es estar protegido? Buenos Aires: Manantial.
Castro-Gómez, S. (2015). Historia de la gubernamentalidad I. Razón de Estado, liberalismo y neoliberalismo en Michel Foucault. Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre.
Dahlstedt, M. y Hertzberg, F. (2012). Schooling Entrepreneurs: Entrepreneurship, Governmentality and Education Policy in Sweden at the Turn of the Millennium. Journal of Pedagogy / Pedagogický Casopis, 3(2), 242-262. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10159-012-0012-x
Deacon, T. (2013). Naturaleza incompleta. Cómo la mente emergió de la materia. Barcelona: Tusquets.
Dey, P. y Steyaert, C. (2016). Rethinking the Space of Ethics in Social Entrepreneurship: Power, Subjectivity, and Practices of Freedom. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 627-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2450-y
Dlaske, K. (2016). Shaping Subjects of Globalisation: At the Intersection of Voluntourism and the New Economy. Multilingua, 35(4), 415-440. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2015-0002
Dlaske, K., Barakos, E., Motobayashi, K. y McLaughlin, M. (2016). “Languaging the Worker: Globalized Governmentalities in/of Language in Peripheral Spaces”. Multilingua, 35(4), 345-359. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2015-0009
Eraranta, K. y Moisander, J. (2011). Psychological Regimes of Truth and Father Identity: Challenges for Work/Life Integration. Organization Studies, 32(4), 509-526. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611400293
Ettlinger, N. (2016). The Governance of Crowdsourcing: Rationalities of the New Exploitation. Environment and Planning, 48(11), 2162-2180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16656182
Etzioni, A. (2001). La tercera vía hacia una buena sociedad. Madrid: Trotta.
Faÿ, E., Introna, L. y Puyou, F. R. (2010). Living with Numbers: Accounting for Subjectivity in/with Management Accounting Systems. Information and Organization, 20(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2009.10.001
Foucault, M. (2007). Nacimiento de la biopolítica. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Gómez, L., Jódar, F. y Bravo, M. (2015). Gubernamentalidad neoliberal y producción de conocimiento en la universidad: genealogía de una configuración subjetiva. Universitas Psychologica, 14(5), 1735-1750. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy14-5.gnpc
Gutiérrez Monclus, P. y Pujol Tarrès, J. (2016). Occupational Therapy: Autonomy, Governmentality and Subjectification. Revista de Estudios Sociales, (57), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.7440/res57.2016.05
Hassoun, D. (2012). Costly attentions: Governing the Media Multitasker. Continuum, 26(4), 653-664. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2012.698041
Hay, S., Kapitzke, C. y Cbse, F. (2009). “Smart state” for a knowledge economy: reconstituting creativity through student subjectivity. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(2), 151-164. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690802700206
Laalo, H. y Heinonen, J. (2016). Governing the Entrepreneurial Mindset: Business Students’ Constructions of Entrepreneurial Subjectivity. European Educational Research Journal, 15(6), 696-713. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116662288
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press.
Lolich, L. (2011). …and the Market Created the Student to its Image and Likening. Neo-liberal Governmentality and its Effects on Higher Education in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 30(2), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2011.569145
Martínez-Basallo, S. P. (2016). Más allá de la gubernamentalidad: políticas de colonización y desarrollo rural en el piedemonte caqueteño (1960-1980). Universitas Humanística, (82), 135-162. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.uh82.gpcd
Matza, T. (2012). “Good Individualism”? Psychology, Ethics, and Neoliberalism in Postsocialist Russia. American Ethnologist, 39(4), 804-818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01396.x
Molina, N. (2015). La subjetividad, polifonía social en el sujeto. En: Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana. Bucaramanga.
Molina, N. (2016a). Avatares de la subjetividad. subjetividades en las Ciencias Sociales. En II Congreso Internacional de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas: Educación y Diversidades. Manizales.
Molina, N. (2016b). De rojo a blanco, huellas y transformaciones. Cali.
Molina, N. (2016c). Quince años no es nada. Posibilidades de la psicología en el postacuerdo. Cali.
Morrissey, J. (2015). Regimes of Performance Practices of the Normalised Self in the Neoliberal University. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(4), 614-634. https:// https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2013.838515
Mosse, D. (2012). Una etnografía de las políticas de la ayuda en la práctica. En B. Pérez (ed.), Antropología y desarrollo. Discurso, prácticas y actores. Madrid: Los Libros de la Catarata, Instituto Universitario de Desarrollo y Cooperación, Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Motobayashi, K. (2016). Language Teacher Subjectivities in Japan’s Diaspora Strategies: Teaching my Language as Someone’s Heritage Language. Multilingua, 35(4), 441-468. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2015-0011
Niesche, R. (2010). Discipline through Documentation: A Form of Governmentality for School Principals. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(3), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603121003692967
Nyamori, R. (2009). Construction and Effects of Markets in a Local Authority in New Zealand. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22(7), 1055-1086. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570910987376
Pellandini-Simányi, L., Hammer, F. y Vargha, Z. (2015). The Financialization of Everyday Life or the Domestication of Finance? Cultural Studies, 29(5-6), 733-759. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2015.1017142
Raaper, R. (2016). Academic Perceptions of Higher Education Assessment Processes in Neoliberal Academia. Critical Studies in Education, 57(2), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.1019901
Reich, A. (2008). Intersecting Work and Learning: Assembling Advanced Liberal Regimes of Governing Workers in Australia. Studies in Continuing Education, 30(3), 199-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370802439912
Rose, N. (1996). Governing “Advanced” Liberal Democracies. En: A. Barry, T. Osborne y N. Rose (eds.). Foucault and Political Reason. Liberalism, Neo-liberalism and Rationalities of Government. London: University College London Press.
Stecher, A. (2013). Un modelo crítico-interpretativo para el estudio de las identidades laborales. Contribuciones a la investigación psicosocial sobre trabajo y subjetividad en América Latina. Universitas Psychologica, 12(4), 1311-1324. https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.UPSY12-4.mcie
Stecher, A. (2015). La empresa flexible como dispositivo de gobierno. Aportes de la analítica de la gubernamentalidad al estudio de las subjetividades laborales en América Latina. Universitas Psychologica, 14(5), 1779-1794.
Suspitsyna, T. (2010). Accountability in American Education as a Rhetoric and a Technology of Governmentality. Journal of Education Policy, 25(February), 567-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930903548411
Thunman, E. (2015). Managing Stress: A Matter of Proactivity or Trust? A Thematic Study of Female- and Male-dominated Wedish Work Settings. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management, 10(2), 134-152.
Varman, R., Saha, B. y Skålén, P. (2011). Market Subjectivity and Neoliberal Governmentality in Higher Education. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(11-12), 1163-1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2011.609134
Wong, P. N. (2010). Frontier Governmentality: The Art of Governing the Self through the Eyes of a Philippine Governing Elite. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 10(103-126).
Zuckerwise, G. M. (2012). Governmentality in Amsterdam’s Red Light District. City, 16(1-2), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2012.662365
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2018 Deidi Yolima Maca-Urbano, Nelson Molina-Valencia
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
© Direitos autorais reservados
O material desta publicação pode ser reproduzido sem autorização, desde que o título, o autor e a fonte institucional sejam citados.
Como Citar
